As a rank and file PPRC member, I am uneasy about the tone and content of some replies to this topic, and would counsel caution in what is set to print. Surely there is no onus on the Committee to issue a further statement at this time. The man on the Clapham Omnibus could only conclude that Kevin and Jayne have asked that the matter remains private between them and the Committee. This may or may not be the case, of course, and the Committee may well choose to elaborate on the circumstances, but, in my opinion, are under no obligation to do so.
There are proper ways to register grievances, and should we not adhere to them, we run the risk of compounding the problem. The proper forum to discuss this issue is the AGM. As an alternative, no doubt there is provision within the Club's constitution to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (and I acknowledge NtS's comments) which would require careful and dispassionate wording of any motion put to such a meeting.
Our Committee is a democratically elected body who give of their time freely, working towards the common interest. I for one would be disappointed if there were not differences of opinion from time to time. Healthy debate has to be a good thing. We can vote on Officers and general Committee at the AGM and any concerns can be introduced in AOB if not discussed as an agenda item.
On a personal note, it was Kev who finally persuaded me, a committed lone wolf, to join the Pacers, when he collared me for the umpteenth time down in the valley. It was the best running decision I could have made. Thanks Kev.